Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Michael A. Emery

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 22, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL A. EMERY DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Dennis L. Beck

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING; ORDER Date: September 6, 2012 , Time: 1:30 P.M.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference hearing in the above captioned matter now set for August 23, 2012, may be continued to September 6, 2012, at 1:30 P.M. before Magistrate Beck.

This continuance is requested by counsel for the defendant. This is a Rule 20 matter, and the parties have been advised that September 6, 2012, is the earliest date the transfer documents will be available to the court and counsel. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court. Assistant United States Attorney Yasin Mohammad has no objection to this request.

The parties agree that time shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, including, but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation and continuing plea negotiation purposes.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DATED: August 21, 2012 /s/ Yasin Mohammad YASIN MOHAMMAD Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender DATED: August 21, 2012 /s/ Andras Farkas ANDRAS FARKAS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant Michael A. Emery

ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, the continuance requested is granted for good cause. The Court finds that the interest of justice outweighs the interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial, and time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20120822

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.