Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Adrian Moon v. M. Mullin

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 22, 2012

ADRIAN MOON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
M. MULLIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 31, 2012, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Rather than filing an amended complaint, plaintiff filed an "Emergency Motion to Consolidate" this case with Moon v. Reese, Case No. 1:12-cv-01243-MJS, another action filed by plaintiff in this district. Dckt. No. 17.

Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that if actions before the court involve a common question of law or fact, the court may consolidate the actions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2). Plaintiff fails to demonstrate that this action, in which there is no operative complaint, shares a common question of law or fact with Moon v. Reese. If plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this action, he may file a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's "Emergency Motion to Consolidate" (Dckt. No. 17), is denied.

20120822

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.