Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Laverne Fields

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 22, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LAVERNE FIELDS, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Honorable William B. Shubb

JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874) ATTORNEY AT LAW 1111 H Street, # 204 Sacramento, CA. 95814 (916) 444-3994 Fax (916) 447-0931 Attorney for Defendant LAVERNE FIELDS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE Date: October 15, 2012 Time: 9:30 a.m.

The United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Jason Hitt, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Laverne Fields, John R. Manning, Esq., and counsel for defendant Erik Solisfox, Christopher Haydn-Myer, Esq., hereby stipulate the following:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status conference on August 27, 2012.

2. By this stipulation, defendants now move to continue the status conference until October 15, 2012 and to exclude time between August 27, 2012 and October 15, 2012 under the Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare).

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request the Court find the following:

a. Counsel for the defendants need additional time to review the discovery, conduct investigation, and interview potential witnesses. Additionally, United States Probation is in the process of preparing a pre plea criminal history report regarding defendant, Laverne Fields, and needs more time to complete the requested report.

b. Counsel for defendants believe the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

c. The Government does not object to the continuance.

d. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.

e. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) within which trial must commence, the time period of August 27, 2012 to October 15, 2012, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) ) and (B)(ii) and (iv), corresponding to Local Code T-4 because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

20120822

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.