Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jimmy Gonzales v. Harold Tate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 26, 2012

JIMMY GONZALES
PLAINTIFF,
v.
HAROLD TATE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael J. Seng United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO AMEND AND FOR A COPY OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF Nos. 9, 12, 13) PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

Plaintiff Jimmy Gonzales ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Plaintiff filed his initial Complaint on December 2, 2011, alleging violation of his rights under the Eighth Amendment due to inadequate medical care. The Court has yet to screen Plaintiff's Complaint or order service.

On April 3, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 9.) On April 16, 2012, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 10.) On June 11, 2012, Plaintiff filed another motion to amend. (ECF No. 13.) Also on June 11, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court provide him with a copy of his First Amended Complaint and permission to send the Court evidence that he had exhausted his administrative remedies. (ECF No. 12.)

Plaintiff's motions are now before the Court.

I. MOTIONS TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

Plaintiff has asked to amend his original Complaint and First Amended Complaint so that he can include additional information and additional parties. (ECF Nos. 9, 12, and 13.)

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that leave to amend shall be freely given. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Plaintiff's motions are GRANTED.

However, the Court will not simply add the allegations contained in the instant motions to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint that includes all of the facts that make up his claim. As a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. See Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Once an amended complaint is filed, the original complaint no longer serves any function in the case. The Court will not refer to or consider any matter in the First Amended Complaint. Therefore, in an amended complaint, each claim and the involvement of each defendant must be sufficiently alleged. The amended complaint should be clearly and boldly titled "Second Amended Complaint," refer to the appropriate case number, and be an original signed under penalty of perjury.

Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint within thirty (30) days of service of this order. Failure to comply with this deadline may result in dismissal of this action.

II. MOTION FOR A COPY OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff has requested that the Court provide him with a copy of his First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 12.)

Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED and the Clerk's Office is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of his First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 10).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120826

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.