(Super. Ct. Nos. NCR71823 & NCR81889)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Duarte , J.
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
Appointed counsel for defendant Richard Arnold Stephens has asked this court to review the record to determine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) We find errors that require modification of the judgment to include mandatory fines and fees not imposed. We shall affirm the judgment as modified.
Defendant received welfare benefits for his minor daughter from April 2006 to April 2007, when he was not, in fact, living with or caring for her. As a result, he received $5,478 to which he was not entitled. Defendant also forged his mother's signature on a document which falsely claimed he had been paying her $600 a month in rent.
Defendant pled guilty in Tehama County case No. NCR71823 to welfare fraud (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 10980, subd.(c)(2)) and forgery (Pen. Code, § 470). On September 10, 2007, the trial court sentenced him to the middle term of two years for welfare fraud and a consecutive eight months for forgery, suspended execution of the sentence, and placed him on five years of formal probation.
On May 26, 2011, defendant was found in possession of 53 marijuana plants. He admitted violating probation in Tehama County case No. NCR71823, pleaded guilty to cultivating marijuana (Heath and Saf. Code, § 11358) and admitted a prior strike (Pen. Code, § 1170.12) in Tehama County case No. NCR81889.
On August 29, 2011, the trial court sentenced defendant to the low term of 16 months for cultivating marijuana, doubled due to the strike, in Tehama County case No. NCR81889. The trial court ordered the two years imposed for welfare fraud in Tehama County case No. NCR71823 to run concurrently to the sentence in Tehama County case No. NCR81889, and the eight months for forgery to run consecutively, for an aggregate term of 40 months.
Defendant was awarded 120 actual days and 60 conduct days on case No. NCR71823, and 91 actual days and 44 conduct days on case No. NCR81889.
Defendant appeals. His request for a certificate of probable cause was denied. (Pen. Code, § 1237.5.) Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks us to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised defendant of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. We have ...