Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wendy Berge v. Carolyn Willford

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 28, 2012

WENDY BERGE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CAROLYN WILLFORD, POSTMASTER U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On August 24, 2012, plaintiff filed several documents identified as "EVIDENCE FOR THE PLAINTIFF" (Dkt. No. 10). Plaintiff is advised that she may not file "evidence" with the court for no purpose, as opposed to, for example, filing evidence in conjunction with a pending motion. Plaintiff is reminded that she must conform her conduct to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the court's Local Rules. See Local Rules 110, 183(a). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's filing entitled "EVIDENCE FOR THE PLAINTIFF" (Dkt. No. 10) is disregarded, and the court shall take no further action in regard to that filing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120828

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.