IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 28, 2012
WENDY BERGE, PLAINTIFF,
CAROLYN WILLFORD, POSTMASTER U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
On August 24, 2012, plaintiff filed several documents identified as "EVIDENCE FOR THE PLAINTIFF" (Dkt. No. 10). Plaintiff is advised that she may not file "evidence" with the court for no purpose, as opposed to, for example, filing evidence in conjunction with a pending motion. Plaintiff is reminded that she must conform her conduct to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the court's Local Rules. See Local Rules 110, 183(a). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's filing entitled "EVIDENCE FOR THE PLAINTIFF" (Dkt. No. 10) is disregarded, and the court shall take no further action in regard to that filing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.