The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joseph C. Spero Judge
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Civil Local Rule 6-1(a)
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Plaintiff Satya Dev Tripuraneni and Defendant Infosys Limited 3 ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 4
The original deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in 5 this action is August 27, 2012. 6
Pursuant to Rule 6-1(a), the parties have agreed that Defendants' new deadline to answer 7 or otherwise respond to the Complaint will be September 17, 2012. 8 In light of Plaintiff's counsel's trial schedule, if Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Complaint is a motion that requires an opposition, the parties agree to stipulate to a request that 10 the Court extend Plaintiff's time to respond to any such motion by 21 days. 11
This is the first stipulation by the parties for an extension of time for Defendant to answer 12 or otherwise respond to the Complaint. 13
This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court 14 order. 15
Dated: August 27, 2012 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 17 18 By /s/ Melinda S. Riechert MELINDA S. RIECHERT ZEENAT BASRAI Attorneys for Defendant 19 20 INFOSYS LIMITED Dated: August 27, 2012 THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM 22 23 By /s/ Steven G. Tidrick 24 STEVEN G. TIDRICK ANDREW L. YOUNKINS 25 Attorneys for Plaintiff SATYA DEV TRIPURANENI
Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Melinda S. Riechert, attest that 3 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I 4 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing 5 is true and correct. Executed this 27 day of August, 2012, at Palo Alto.
/s/ Melinda S. Riechert Melinda S. Riechert
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...