Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Patrick Moye v. H. A. Rios

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 29, 2012

PATRICK MOYE,
PETITIONER,
v.
H. A. RIOS, JR.,
RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER PERMITTING PETITIONER TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL TRAVERSE IN ) RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER (DOC. 19) NO ) LATER THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER DEADLINE FOR FILING THE SUPPLEMENTAL TRAVERSE: THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER SERVICE

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pending before the Court is the petition, which was filed on December 27, 2011. Respondent filed an answer on May 7, 2012, and Petitioner filed a traverse on June 28, 2012, at which time it appeared that the pleadings were complete.

On August 9, 2012, Respondent filed a supplement to the answer to the petition.

Good cause appearing, the Court sua sponte grants to Petitioner thirty days in which to file a supplemental traverse in order to respond to Respondent's supplemental answer.

Petitioner may FILE a supplemental traverse no later than thirty (30) days after the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120829

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.