UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 29, 2012
H. A. RIOS, JR.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER PERMITTING PETITIONER TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL TRAVERSE IN ) RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER (DOC. 19) NO ) LATER THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER DEADLINE FOR FILING THE SUPPLEMENTAL TRAVERSE: THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER SERVICE
Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pending before the Court is the petition, which was filed on December 27, 2011. Respondent filed an answer on May 7, 2012, and Petitioner filed a traverse on June 28, 2012, at which time it appeared that the pleadings were complete.
On August 9, 2012, Respondent filed a supplement to the answer to the petition.
Good cause appearing, the Court sua sponte grants to Petitioner thirty days in which to file a supplemental traverse in order to respond to Respondent's supplemental answer.
Petitioner may FILE a supplemental traverse no later than thirty (30) days after the date of service of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.