Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Title: Gohar Sarkisyan v. Bank of America Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 12, 2012

TITLE: GOHAR SARKISYAN
v.
BANK OF AMERICA CORP., ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Michael W. Fitzgerald, U.S. District Judge

JS-6

CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL

PRESENT: HONORABLE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Rita Sanchez None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

On July 3, 2012, Defendant Citibank, N.A. filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Docket No. 4). On July 12, 2012, Defendant DB Servicing Corp. filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Docket No. 6).

On August 1, 2012, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1), the Court granted Plaintiff Gohar Sarkisyan's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and denied as moot Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. (Docket No. 11). The Court ordered Sarkisyan to file the First Amended Complaint ("FAC") on or before August 15, 2012. (Id.)

On August 16, 2012, Defendants Citibank, N.A. and DB Servicing Corp. each filed a Request for Dismissal of Action because Sarkisyan had failed to file a FAC. (Docket Nos. 12, 13).

Consequently, on August 24, 2012, the Court ordered Sarkisyan to show cause, in writing, on or before September 7, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Docket No. 14). The Court warned that "[f]ailure of Sarkisyan to respond by this date may result in the Court's dismissing this action with prejudice." (Id.)

On September 10, 2012, Defendants Citibank, N.A. and DB Servicing Corp. each filed a Renewed Request for Dismissal of Complaint with Prejudice because Sarkisyan had failed to file a response to the Order to Show Cause. (Docket Nos. 15, 16).

To date, Sarkisyan has filed neither any response to the Order to Show nor a FAC.

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120912

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.