IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 13, 2012
DELPHINE ALLEN, ET AL.,
CITY OF OAKLAND, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thelton E. Henderson, Judge United States District Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPANDED PAGE LIMITS
11 Plaintiffs filed an administrative motion seeking to expand the page limits on their 2 briefs in support of their motion for a receivership. They request sixty pages for their 13 opening brief and, if Defendants' opposition exceeds twenty-five pages, twenty-five pages 14 for their reply brief. The time for filing an opposition to or support for the motion has 15 passed, and no responses have been filed. The Court now GRANTS IN PART and DENIES 16 IN PART Plaintiffs' request. Plaintiffs' opening brief shall not exceed fifty pages. The 17 Court finds it premature to consider expanding the page limit on Plaintiffs' reply brief 18 because Defendants have not requested that their opposition brief be allowed to exceed the 19 twenty-five-page limit. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.