Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bret Dillon v. Peter Jimenez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 13, 2012

BRET DILLON,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
PETER JIMENEZ, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION ECF No. 23

Plaintiff Bret Dillon ("Plaintiff") is a former California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 29, 2012, Defendant Jimenez filed a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. ECF No. 23. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not responded.*fn1

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff as the non-moving party is required to serve and file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of the moving party's motion. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to serve and file a response to Defendant's motion to dismiss within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Failure to file an opposition will be construed as a waiver of the opportunity to file an opposition, and failure to respond may result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.