UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 13, 2012
PETER JIMENEZ, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION ECF No. 23
Plaintiff Bret Dillon ("Plaintiff") is a former California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 29, 2012, Defendant Jimenez filed a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. ECF No. 23. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not responded.*fn1
Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff as the non-moving party is required to serve and file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of the moving party's motion. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to serve and file a response to Defendant's motion to dismiss within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Failure to file an opposition will be construed as a waiver of the opportunity to file an opposition, and failure to respond may result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.