The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., Bar #177913 Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 498-5700 Attorneys for Defendant JAMES O. MOLEN
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE TO OCTOBER 19, 2012, AT 9:00 A.M.
THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for September 14, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., and reset it for October 19, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.
Counsel for defendant requires further time to review discovery, to confer with client, and to prepare.
The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through October 19, 2012, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4).
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on October 19, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4). The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
Dated: September 14, 2012
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...