Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sujla Maharj v. California Bank & Trust

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 18, 2012

SUJLA MAHARJ,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE

On July 24, 2012, Defendant filed a "Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Expert Witness Disclosures/Reports" under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. (ECF 54.) In essence, Defendant argues Plaintiff's "expert witness disclosure that purports to designate three of [his] treating physicians as percipient expert witnesses" should be stricken since the disclosure does not comply with a provision of the Court's April 5, 2011 Scheduling Order. (Def.'s Mot. 2:3-18, 2:23-3:10, 3:25-26, ECF No. 54-2.) However, the referenced provision in the Scheduling Order was stricken on September 11, 2012, in accordance with the scheduling practices of the undersigned judge, to whom this matter was reassigned after the Scheduling Order issued. (ECF No. 71, 1:16-18.) Therefore, the motion is denied.

20120918

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.