Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Querubin et al. v. Americas Wholesale Lender et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 21, 2012

QUERUBIN ET AL.
v.
AMERICAS WHOLESALE LENDER ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Dolly M. Gee, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

V.R. Vallery Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present IN CHAMBERS - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 120 days after the complaint is filed. Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 20 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States.)

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before October 22, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently:

Proof(s) of service of summons and complaint on the defendant(s):

An answer by the following defendant(s): Americas Wholesale Lender; Litton Loan Servicing LP; GS Mortgage Securities Corp; Deutsche Bank National Trust Company; Wells Fargo Bank NA; Gsamp Trust 2005 WMCI; Cal Western Reconveyance Corporation; Gary Nord; Barbara Nord; Roudabeh Beygzadeth Elias In cases removed from State Court, responsive pleadings filed by all defendants;

Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Plaintiff's request that the clerk enter default judgment or plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by this Court. (Local Rules 7-1 and 7-2).

No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be if the above mentioned documents are not filed by the date indicated above.

20120921

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.