Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Ernesto Salgado-Guzman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 21, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ERNESTO SALGADO-GUZMAN, DEMETRIO CORTEZ-SALGADO, ZEFERINA SALGADO GUZMAN DE CORTEZ, VICTORINO BAZANTE-PACHECO
AND FLORENCIO MORALES-SOLANO, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KIMBERLY A. SANCHEZ Assistant U.S. Attorney 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, CA 93721 Telephone: (559)497-4000

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Benjamin B. Wagner, United States Attorney and Kimberly A. Sanchez, Assistant U.S. Attorney and Yan Shrayberman, attorney for Ernesto Salgado-Guzman, Mark Coleman, attorney for Demetrio Cortez-Salgado, Roger Bonakdar, attorney for Zeferina Salgado Guzman de Cortez, and Hadi Ty Kharazi, attorney for Florencio Morales-Solano, that the status conference set for September 24 at 1:00 pm be continued to October 22, 2012 at 1:00 pm. The parties have been involved in plea discussions, and need additional time to finalize such discussions. Additionally, the government is working with defendant's Florencio Morales-Solano and Victorino Bazante-Pacheco on further investigation involving handwriting analyses, and that examination has not concluded. Co-defendant Victorino Bazante-Pacheco requested a continuance of the status conference to October 22, 2012, but the parties did not have all counsels' concurrence in a continuance when the request was filed. The parties further request the Court to enter an Order finding that the "ends of justice" served by a continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that the delay occasioned by such continuance is excluded from the Act's time limits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120921

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.