Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Raygina Fox v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 26, 2012

RAYGINA FOX,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff filed an Objection on September 25, 2012 to Defendant's Violation of Privacy Rights, in which Plaintiff indicates that "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment papers contain private information of Plaintiff Raygina Fox, and others," including birth date information and confidential financial information. (ECF No. 50.) Plaintiff filed a "sampling" of Defendant's summary judgment papers as an exhibit to its Objection, which evinces that identifying information was included in these documents in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 5.2(a) and Local Rule 140(a). See ECF No. 50-1. Therefore, Defendant shall file a redacted copy of its Motion for Summary Judgment and all supporting papers, which conform to Rule 5.2(a) and Local Rule 140(a), no later than September 28, 2012.

Further, the Clerk of the Court shall file Defendant's original Motion for Summary Judgment and supporting papers (ECF Nos. 18-23, 25-42, 44, 47) under seal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120926

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.