Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Pang Mua

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 27, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
PANG MUA,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service 2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330 Fresno, California 93721-2226 Telephone: (559) 487-5561 Attorney for Defendant PANG MUA

AMENDED STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER

Date: November 5, 2012 Time: 1:00 p.m. Judge: Hon. Sheila K. Oberto

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, KIMBERLY A. SANCHEZ, Assistant United States Attorney, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for Defendant Pang Mua, that the date for status conference may be continued to November 5, 2012, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is October 1, 2012. The requested new date is November 5, 2012.

The parties are currently engaged in investigations and negotiation to determine a proper resolution of this matter. Both agree that further investigation and other activities are necessary and appropriate. It is requested that this continuance be granted to enable the parties to properly advise the court of the posture of the case at the upcoming status conference.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for effective preparation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120927

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.