IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 28, 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413 Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 498-5700 Attorney for Defendant LONNELL McCARTER
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE
Date: October 1, 2012 Time: 9:30 a.m.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Michelle Prince, counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey Staniels, counsel for defendant LONNELL McCARTER, that the status conference scheduled for October 1, 2012, be vacated and the matter continued until November 13, 2012, for further status conference at the request of the defense.
The reason for the continuance is to allow for completion of now-active negotiation regarding possible non-trial resolution of the case and for further trial related investigation in the event terms for non-trial resolution cannot be agreed to. The requested date also accounts for intervening schedule conflicts for vacation, an office retreat and government counsel's trial schedule. At the last status conference the court urged the parties to be prepared to announce resolution or to set a trial date. The parties seek this one additional continuance before doing so.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the interests of justice served by the granting of this continuance outweigh the interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial and that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded between October 1, 2012, and November 13, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv), Local Code T-4 (time to prepare).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
The above stipulation of the parties is accepted. The status conference set for October 1, 2012, is VACATED. This case is ordered to be re-calendared on November 13, 2012, for status conference.
The court finds, based on the reasons stated above, that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
By the Court,
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.