Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Raygina Fox v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 1, 2012

RAYGINA FOX,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE REQUEST

On September 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed an ex parte Request and Objection, in which she seeks an order requiring "Defendant to re-file its [summary judgment] papers, and file under seal, all [non-public personal information contained in the summary judgment papers on the public docket]." (Pl.'s Ex Parte Request 5:25-6:1.)

Plaintiff neither addresses in its ex parte request what legal standard governs the request, nor demonstrates that she has satisfied the applicable standard. See Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665, 677 (9th Cir. 2010)("Two standards generally govern motions to seal documents[.]") Therefore, Plaintiff's ex parte Request is DENIED.

20121001

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.