UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 5, 2012
BILLY G. ERVIN, JR.; PLAINTIFF,
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, A GOVERNMENT ENTITY; CITY OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, A GOVERNMENT ENTITY; DOES 1 - 25; DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Dean D. Pregerson
Magistrate: Hon. Frederick F. Mumm
JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANTS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [FED.R.CIV.PROC. 56]
[Statement of Uncontroverted Material Facts and Conclusions of Law and Proposed Order filed concurrently herewith]
Date: September 24, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 3 Pretrial: October 29, 2012 Trial: November 6, 2012
The Defendants City of Los Angeles, et al Motion for Summary Judgment came on regularly for hearing on September 24, 2012, before the Honorable Dean D. Pregerson. The following appearances were made by the parties: on behalf of the Plaintiffs, Attorneys Altus W. Hudson, II, and on behalf of Defendants, City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles Police Department Rena M. Shahandeh. After considering the moving, opposing, and reply papers, and having heard the arguments of counsel, the Court issued its Order granting the Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of Defendants City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles Police Department.
Therefore, for the reasons set forth by this Court granting the Summary Judgment, judgment is hereby entered in Defendants' favor and against BILLY G. ERVIN, JR. Because the Defendants are the prevailing party, they shall be entitled to recover their costs reasonably incurred.
Honorable Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge
IT IS SO ORDERED:
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.