UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 5, 2012
IAMTHEBEAST SSSOTLOHIEFMJN, PETITIONER,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: George H. King United States District Judge
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Respondent has objected. As modified below, the Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
The final sentence of Footnote 1 of the Report is replaced by:
His surname means "Six six six of the Lord of Hosts in Edmond Frank M[a]cGillivray, Jr., now." (Id.)
IT IS ORDERED that Ground One of the petition is GRANTED and Ground Two of the petition is DENIED. The following conditional writ of habeas corpus shall issue:
Within ninety days of this judgment becoming final (meaning the conclusion of any and all appeals), the Riverside County Superior Court must vacate Petitioner's conviction on Count 3 unless the State of California elects to retry Petitioner on Count 3.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.