Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

John Lillicotch v. Nationwide Insurance Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 10, 2012

JOHN LILLICOTCH,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND DOES 1-30 INCLUSIVE,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Judge

ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, plaintiff John Lillicotch and defendant 19 Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (erroneously sued herein as Nationwide Insurance 20 Company), state the following. On September 20, 2012, Defendant filed a motion for summary 21 judgment and/or summary adjudication of issues. [Docket No. 16]. On October 4, 2012, Plaintiff 22 filed an opposition to Defendant's motion. [Docket No. 20]. Currently, Defendant's reply brief 23 must be filed with the Court on or before October 11, 2012. The hearing for this motion is 24 scheduled for October 25, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.

25 The parties, through their undersigned counsel, are currently engaged in settlement 26 discussions in an attempt to informally resolve this dispute. Counsel have met and conferred and agree that it is in the interest of the parties and the interests of justice to allow for additional time to engage in this process and to minimize unnecessary litigation expenses during this time.

Accordingly, the parties hereby request that the filing date for Defendant's reply brief be extended for one week from October 11, 2012, to October 18, 2012. This extension of time does not alter 3 the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order, particularly the October 25, 4 2012 hearing date before the Court. No previous stipulation to extend time has been filed with 5 regard to this motion for summary judgment.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Date: October 10, 2012 INSURANCE LITIGATORS & COUNSELORS 8 9 By: /s/ Joseph John Turri_____________________ JOSEPH JOHN TURRI Attorney for Plaintiff 10 11 JOHN LILLICOTCH 12 13 Date: October 10, 2012 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 14 15 By: /s/ Shivani Nanda JOHN T. BURNITE SHIVANI NANDA 16 Attorneys for Defendant NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE 17 COMPANY (Erroneously named and served herein as NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY)

ORDER

Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the filing deadline for 22 Defendant's reply brief is extended to October 18, 2012.The October 25, 2012 hearing date is 1:30 p.m. 23 moved to November 1, 2012 at 1:00 p.m.

By The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Judge

ATTESTATION CERTIFICATE

In accord with the Northern District of California's General Order No. 45, Section X.(B), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 4 signatories who are listed on the signature page.

/s/ Shivani Nanda SHIVANI NANDA 7 8 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 525 Market Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Tel: (415) 433-0990 Fax: (415) 434-1370

20121010

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.