The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ) TO EXCLUDE TIME
Date: December 21, 2012Time: 9:00 a.m.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Michelle Rodriguez, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Matthew C. Bockmon, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for Defendant, DAVID GRIFFITH OSBORNE, that the status conference hearing date of Friday, October 12, 2012, be vacated and a new status conference hearing date of Friday, December 21, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.,be set.
The reason for this continuance is because defense counsel needs additional time to review discovery with the client, continue investigating the facts of the case, and for meetings between parties with the goal being to resolve the case by way of disposition.
It is further stipulated that the time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this order, October 11, 2012, through and including December 21, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A)&(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4, and that the ends of justice to be served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.
Dated: October 11, 2012 Respectfully submitted, DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender /s/ Matthew C. Bockmon MATTHEW C. BOCKMON Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant DAVID GRIFFITH OSBORNE Dated: October 11, 2012 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ Matthew C. Bockmon for MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff
Based on the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties filed on October 11, 2012, and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDEREDthat the status conference currently scheduled for Friday, October 12, 2012 be vacated and that the case be set for Friday, December 21, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded during the time period from the date of this stipulation, October 11, 2012, through and including December 21, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A)&(B)(iv), [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4.
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...