UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
October 12, 2012
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTORS, LLC,
ORACLE AMERICA, INC. AND ORACLE CORPORATION,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge
ORDER ASSESSING JURY COSTS
United States District Court District of California
For the Northern
At 12:53 a.m. on Friday, October 12, 2012, the parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). See ECF No. 221. Jury 19 selection was set to begin that same day, October 12, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. On the morning of 20 October 12, 2012, the Court notified the parties that their Stipulation of Dismissal was filed too late 21 to excuse the potential jurors from appearing for jury duty that afternoon. See ECF No. 223. 22
Accordingly, the Court notified the parties that it would assess jury costs pursuant to Civil Local 23
Rule 40-1. Id. 24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the jury costs in the amount of $2,974.89 are assessed 25 against the parties. These costs are broken down as follows: (1) $1720.00 to pay the $40 per diem 26 attendance fee to 42 potential jurors who appeared; (2) $664.89 to reimburse the potential jurors for 27 travel costs at $0.555 per mile; and (3) $630.00 to pay for parking validation for the potential 28 jurors. Any party wishing to contest this assessment may do so by filing a declaration showing 2 cause why the costs should not be assessed by 12:00 p.m. on October 19, 2012. Otherwise, by 3 that time each party shall pay $1,487.45, by check payable to the Clerk of Court, United States 4 District Court, 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.