UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 12, 2012
TITLE: ANTONIO RAZO
CITY OF ORANGE, ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Cormac J. Carney, United States District Judge
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
PRESENT: HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Michelle Urie N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [filed 9/13/12]
On September 13, 2012, Defendant City of Orange ("the City") filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Antonio Razo's Complaint after removing the case from state court on September 6, 2012. (Dkt. Nos. 1 [Notice of Removal], 5 [Mot. to Dismiss].) The motion is scheduled for a hearing on October 22, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. Mr. Razo's opposition was due on October 1, 2012. See Local Rule 7-9. As of October 12, 2012, Ms. Razo has not yet filed an opposition, or any other papers related to this motion. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Mr. Razo to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, or in the alternative why the City's motion should not be granted based on his failure to timely file an opposition. Mr. Razo must file and serve a response to this order no later than October 19, 2012. The City shall have until October 26, 2012, to file a reply. The hearing on the City's motion to dismiss is hereby CONTINUED to November 5, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.