Social Security No. 2 4 5 0 (Last 4 digits)
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER MONTH DAY YEAR
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. Ocotber 12 2012
x GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Docket no. 11-00542, Ct. 18: Wire Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and Docket no. 11-00543, Ct. 20: Wire Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 as charged in each of the Indictments both filed on June 15, 2011 The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, James Lloyd, is hereby committed on Count 18 of Docket no. 11-00542 and Count 20 of Docket no. 11-00543 to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of 156 months. This term consists of 156 months on Count 18 of Docket no. 11-00542 and Count 20 of Docket no. 11-00543, to be served concurrently.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years. This term consists of three years on each of Count 18 of Docket no. 11-00542 and Count 20 of Docket no. 11-00543, all such terms to run concurrently under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office, General Order 05-02, and General Order 01-05, including the three special conditions delineated in General Order 01- 05;
The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall participate in an outpatient substance abuse treatment and counseling program that includes urinalysis, breath, and/or sweat patch testing, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall abstain from using illicit drugs and alcohol, and abusing prescription medications during the period of supervision;
As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall pay all or part of the costs of treating the defendant's alcohol dependency to the aftercare contractor during the period of community supervision, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3672. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall apply all monies received from income tax refunds, lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation;
The defendant shall not engage, as whole or partial owner, employee or otherwise, in any business involving loan programs, telemarketing activities, investment programs or any other business involving the solicitation of funds or cold-calls to customers without the express approval of the Probation Officer prior to engagement in such employment. Further, the defendant shall provide the Probation Officer with access to any and all business records, client lists and other records pertaining to the operation of any business owned, in whole or in part, by the defendant, as directed by the Probation Officer; and
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $200, which is due immediately.
Any unpaid balance shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $25 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $22,258,489.04 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
The amount of restitution ordered shall be paid as set forth on the lists attached to this judgment. If the defendant makes a partial payment, each payee shall receive approximately proportional payment unless another priority order or percentage payment is specified in this judgment.
Restitution shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $150 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. If any amount of the restitution remains unpaid after release from custody, nominal monthly payments of at least 10 percent of defendant's gross monthly income, but not less than $150, whichever is greater, during the period of supervised release and shall begin 30 days after the commencement of supervision. Nominal restitution payments are ordered as the court finds that the defendant's economic circumstances do not allow for either immediate or future payment of the amount ordered.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(3)(A), interest on the restitution ordered is waived because the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest. Payments may be subject to penalties for default and delinquency pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
In relation to Docket No. 11-00542, Lloyd shall be held jointly and severally liable with convicted co-participants Allen Bruce Agler, Joel Lee Craft Jr., Robert Keskemety, Jady Laurence Herrmann, Joseph McCarthy, Matthew Bryan Wellman-Mackin, and Robert Ramirez for $8,892,997.99 of the restitution ordered in this judgment.
In relation to Docket No. 11-00543, Lloyd shall be held jointly and severally liable with convicted co-participants
Daniel Toll, Joel Lee Craft Jr., Paul Baker, Bart Douglas Slanaker, Allen Bruce Agler, Albert Greenhouse, Delitha Floyd, Brian Emmanuel Ellis, Daniel Morabito, and David Nelson for $13,365,491.05 of the restitution ordered in this judgment. The victims' recovery is limited to the amount of their loss and the defendant's ...