UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
October 15, 2012
K. OLIVER, PLAINTIFF,
MICROSOFT CORPORATION AND DOES 1-25, INCLUSIVE,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge
STIPULATION TO ALLOW FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
WHEREAS Plaintiff has stated that she intends to file the Third Amended Complaint, 3 attached hereto as Exhibit A; 4
WHEREAS without waiving any objection it may have to the Third Amended Complaint, Defendant does not object to Plaintiff filing the Third Amended Complaint attached hereto as 6 Exhibit A; 7
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through 8 their respective attorneys of record that Plaintiff may file the Third Amended Complaint, a copy 9 of which is attached hereto. 10
Dated: October 12, 2012 KATHLEEN M. LUCAS SHAWNA B. CASEBIER THE LUCAS LAW FIRM By: /s/ Kathleen M. Lucas Kathleen M. Lucas Attorneys for Plaintiff K. Oliver 18 Dated: October 12, 2012 LYNNE C. HERMLE 19 JESSICA R. PERRY BROOKE D. ARENA KRISTEN JACOBY ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP By: /s/ Lynne C. Hermle Lynne C. Hermle 23 Attorneys for Defendant Microsoft Corporation
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Defendant acknowledges that the Third Amended Complaint has been served on Defendant and Defendant's response and/or objection thereto is 12 due by November 2, 2012. 13 14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.