UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 15, 2012
JANICE EVANS, PLAINTIFF,
CARROWS RESTAURANTS, INC., ET AL.,
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CARROWS RESTAURANTS, INC. ONLY; [PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Janice Evans ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Carrows Restaurants, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, 20 that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Defendant Carrows Restaurants, Inc. 21 is dismissed with prejudice from this action. 22
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendant Carrows Restaurants, Inc. that this case has been settled as between them and all issues and controversies have been 24 resolved to their mutual satisfaction. Plaintiff and Defendant Carrows Restaurants, Inc. request 25 the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of their settlement agreement under the 26 authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).
Date: October 4, 2012 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 2 3 /s/ Tanya E. Moore 4 Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff Janice Evans Date: October 3, 2012 CATALINA RESTAURANT GROUP 8 9 /s/ Luciana O'Brien Luciana O'Brien Attorneys for Defendant Carrows Restaurants, Inc.
The parties having so stipulated, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff Janice Evans and Defendant Carrows Restaurants, Inc. shall comply with the terms of the confidential Settlement Agreement and Release in Full, the terms of which 18 are incorporated herein by reference. 19
2. By consent of Plaintiff Janice Evans and Defendant Carrows Restaurants, Inc.,
20 the Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the 21 settlement agreement. 22
3. Except as provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, Carrows Restaurants, Inc. is dismissed with prejudice from this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.