IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 15, 2012
DEIDRA A. LINTZ,
JOHN E. POTTER, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 for reconsideration of the order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants and for relief from the judgment entered against her following the summary judgment order. "A motion for reconsideration should not be granted, . . . unless the . . . court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the controlling law." Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co., 571 F.3d 873, 880 (9th Cir. 2009) (citation omitted). Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration fails to satisfy this standard and is therefore denied; the hearing on the motion currently scheduled for October 22, 2012 is vacated.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.