The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND ) ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING ) HEARING ) Old Date: Nov. 5, 2012 ) Old Time: 8:30 a.m. New Date: May 6, 2013 ) New Time: 8:30 a.m. ) Court: Four
(Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill)
Defendant Kevin Patrick Sluga pleaded guilty on January 8, 2010 to the Information filed in this case. Sentencing is currently set for Nov. 5, 2012, at 8:30 a.m.
This case is related to the pending case U.S. v. David Crisp, et al. (No. 1:11-cr-0026 LJO), which the Court has designated as complex. The present case concerns transactions or events related to the scheme and artifice to defraud mortgage loan companies and federally insured lending/financial institutions that is charged in U.S. v. David Crisp, et al..
To allow additional time for Mr. Sluga to fulfill his obligations under the plea agreement, the parties hereby stipulate and jointly request that the Court order that the sentencing hearing in this case be continued from Nov. 5, 2012 to May 6, 2013, at 8:30 a.m., or the earliest date thereafter that is convenient to the Court. The parties further stipulate and jointly request that the Court extend the deadline to submit informal objections to the PreSentence Report (PSR) to three weeks prior to the continued sentencing date, and extend the deadline to file formal objections to the PSR to one week prior to the continued sentencing date.
Respectfully submitted, Dated: Oct. 16, 2012 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: /s/ Kirk E. Sherriff STANLEY A. BOONE KIRK E. SHERRIFF HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III Assistant U.S. Attorneys Dated: Oct. 16, 2012 /s/ George Buehler (authorized on 10/15/12) GEORGE BUEHLER Attorney for Defendant KEVIN PATRICK SLUGA
The court has reviewed and considered the stipulation of the parties to continue the sentencing hearing in this case. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the sentencing hearing is continued from November 5, 2012 to May 6, 2013, at 8:30 a.m., and that the deadlines to submit informal objections and to file formal objections to the Pre-Sentence Report are extended as set forth above.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...