Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dexter Brown v. Edmund Brown

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 16, 2012

DEXTER BROWN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EDMUND BROWN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 12, 2012, the undersigned dismissed plaintiff's amended complaint with thirty days to file a second amended complaint. Thirty days passed and plaintiff did not respond to the April 12, 2012 order. Accordingly, on May 25, 2012, the undersigned recommended that this action be dismissed.

On May 29, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file his second amended complaint. Good cause appearing, on June 6, 2012, the undersigned vacated the May 25, 2012 findings and recommendations and granted plaintiff thirty days to file his second amended complaint.

Thirty days passed from the June 6, 2012 order and plaintiff did not file his second amended complaint. Accordingly, on July 20, 2012, the undersigned again recommended that this action be dismissed. On July 23, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for appointment of counsel. Because this request demonstrated an interest by plaintiff in prosecuting this action, plaintiff was granted one final opportunity to file a second amended complaint. Accordingly, on August 20, 2012, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a second amended complaint.

The thirty day period set in the August 20, 2012 order has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

20121016

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.