Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Shin v. Wells Fargo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 18, 2012

SHIN
v.
WELLS FARGO, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable James V. Selna

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable James V. Selna

Nancy Boehme Not Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Remanding Case to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange

On October 9, 2012, Wells Fargo, N.A. removed this case from the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange of the basis of diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). (Notice of Removal, p. 2.)

Plaintiffs are citizens of California. (Id., pp. 2-3.)

Wells Fargo asserts that it is a citizen of only South Dakota, and hence it is diverse to the plaintiffs. (Id., p. 5 et seq.) The Court has previously found and stated at length its conclusion that Wells Fargo is also a citizen of the state of California. Greenlee

Wells Fargo, EDCV 12-789 JVS (DTBx) (Docket No. 14.)

Because complete diversity is lacking here, the Court sua sponte remands the case to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange..

20121018

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.