IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 18, 2012
THOMAS DIAS, PLAINTIFF,
RAUL REYNA, JR. ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
Presently before the court are plaintiff's motions to compel production of documents pursuant to a subpoena to the California Highway Patrol ("CHP") and pursuant to document requests propounded on defendants, noticed for hearing on November 15, 2012. (Dkt. Nos. 24, 25.) It appears that the parties are not using the joint statement procedure under Local Rule 251, because plaintiff is alleging that the CHP and defendants provided no documents in response to the subpoena. Accordingly, for clarification purposes, any opposition to plaintiff's motions shall be filed no later than November 1, 2012. Any reply brief shall be filed no later than November 8, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.