Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pit River Tribe; Native Coalition For v. Bureau of Land Management; United States Department of the Interior

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 23, 2012

PIT RIVER TRIBE; NATIVE COALITION FOR MEDICINE LAKE HIGHLANDS DEFENSE; AND MOUNT SHASTA BIOREGIONAL ECOLOGY CENTER,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; U.S. FOREST SERVICE; ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION; AND CALPINE CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.
PIT RIVER TRIBE; NATIVE COALITION FOR MEDICINE LAKE HIGHLANDS DEFENSE; AND MOUNT SHASTA BIOREGIONAL ECOLOGY CENTER, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; AND CALPINE CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS. PIT RIVER TRIBE; NATIVE COALITION FOR MEDICINE LAKE HIGHLANDS DEFENSE; AND MOUNT SHASTA BIOREGIONAL ECOLOGY
CENTER,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION; AND CALPINE CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge

RELATED CASE ORDER

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation of the actions is effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the two actions denominated 2:04-cv-0956 RRB JFM and 2:04-cv-0969 RRB JFM be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds shall remain assigned for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in the reassigned cases only are hereby VACATED.

Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:04-cv-0956 JAM JFM and 2:04-cv-0969 JAM JFM.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustments in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

John A. Mendez

20121023

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.