Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Raygina Fox v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 23, 2012

RAYGINA FOX,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

NOTICE THAT PROPOSED ORDER WILL NOT BE SIGNED

The parties filed a stipulation and proposed order on October 22, 2012, in which they state:

The parties, as part of their settlement, jointly request the Court allow Plaintiff's redacting of claimed NPI information in Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court is requested to pull from the public website the existing Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff will re-file Defendant's papers with the claimed NPI redacted. (ECF No. 68).

The parties' proposed order will not be signed since the parties have neither complied with applicable sealing procedures nor provided authority supporting the sealing of what they reference in their stipulation as "claimed NPI information." Further, the parties have not sufficiently explained in their stipulation why the Court should direct the Clerk of Court to remove the referenced withdrawn summary judgment motion from the public docket and to authorize the filing of the same withdrawn summary judgment, with redactions.

20121023

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.