UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
October 24, 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
RONALD PELAEZ, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Maxine M. Chesney
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING DATE AND ORDER DENYING STIPULATION STIPULATION
The parties stipulate as follows: 20
1. Mr. Pelaez will resolve this matter by way of a guilty plea pursuant to the negotiated Plea Agreement in this matter which has been the subject of much discussion and revision.
2. To facilitate the change of plea contemplated by the parties, Mr. Pelaez needs to be 23 arraigned on the proposed Information.
3. Counsel for the Government has no objection to this matter being continued until November 14, 2012 at 2:30 p.m. for change of plea considering the above circumstance.
4. The parties further stipulate and agree that the time between October 24, 2012 and November 14, 2012 should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, specifically pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) to allow effective preparation of counsel.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
DATED: October 23, 2012 -S-9 KEVIN J. BARRY Assistant United States Attorney DATED: October 23, 2012 JAMES PHILLIP VAUGHNS. Attorney for Defendant PELAEZ
ES DISTRI AT CT
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.