Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Soraya Ross, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Sioux Honey Association

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


October 24, 2012

SORAYA ROSS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
SIOUX HONEY ASSOCIATION, COOPERATIVE, AN IOWA ENTITY,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER 21 Complaint Filed: April 2, 2012

WHEREAS, on September 11, 2012, Plaintiff filed Plaintiff's Third Amended Class Action Complaint (the "TAC"); 3

WHEREAS, on September 26, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation requesting the Court 4 to extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the TAC from September 25, 5 2012 to October 12, 2012; 6

WHEREAS, on September 27, 2012, the Court granted the requested extension;

WHEREAS, on October 9, 2012, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss the TAC ("Motion to Dismiss");

WHEREAS, the deadline for Plaintiff to file her opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss ("Opposition") is October 23, 2012;

WHEREAS, the deadline for Defendant to file its reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss ("Reply") is October 30, 2012; 12

WHEREAS, in order to accommodate a change in the schedule of Plaintiff's Counsel,

Plaintiff requires additional time to oppose the Motion to Dismiss; 14

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have met and conferred regarding an extension of time for Plaintiff to file her Opposition and a corresponding extension of time for Defendant to 16 file its Reply; 17

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT:

1. The deadline to file Plaintiff's Opposition is extended from October 23, 2012, to October 30, 2012;

2. The deadline to file Defendant's Reply is extended from October 30, 2012 to November 6, 2012.

DATED: October 23, 2012 KIESEL BOUCHER LARSON LLP By: /s/ Paul R. Kiesel Paul R. Kiesel, Esq. Jeffrey A. Koncius, Esq. 8648 Wilshire Boulevard 25 26 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Tel.: (310) 854-4444 Fax: (310) 854-0812 Paul O. Paradis, Esq. Gina M. Tufaro, Esq. Mark A. Butler, Esq. HORWITZ, HORWITZ & PARADIS, Attorneys at Law 570 7th Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10018 Tel.: (212) 986-4500 Fax: (212) 986-4501 Joseph J. M. Lange, Esq. JOSEPH J. M. LANGE LAW CORPORATION 222 North Sepulveda Blvd.Suite 2000 El Segundo, CA 90245 Tel.: (310) 414-1880 Fax: (310) 414-1882 Attorneys for Plaintiff Ross DATED: October 23, 2012 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP By: /s/ David I. Dalby David Ian Dalby One California Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 362-6000 Fax: (415) 834-9070 Attorneys for Defendant

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 21

A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN

IS ORDERED

20121024

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.