UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 25, 2012
KITTRICH CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
GLOBAL GLORY INDUSTRIAL LIMITED, A HONG KONG CORPORATION; BIG LOTS STORES, INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION; AND DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE EXPERT DEADLINES
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Plaintiff Kittrich Corporation ("Kittrich") and Defendant Global Glory
Industrial Limited ("Global Glory"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate 4 and agree to the following:
The parties have reached agreement on the principal terms of a settlement and are 6 currently preparing settlement documentation. The parties agree that in the interests of judicial 7 economy, to preserve the parties' resources, and to facilitate settlement, the expert deadlines 8 from the October 5, 2012 Order [Docket No. 32] should be continued approximately 60 days so 9 that the following deadlines apply:
January 18, 2013: Deadline for each party to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) and (C)'s initial expert witness disclosure requirements February 18, 2013: Deadline for any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(D)(ii) The parties have previously obtained one approximately 45 day extension on these deadlines.
Dated: October 25, 2012 SNR DENTON US LLP By:____________/S/ Karen C. Marchiano _______ Karen C. Marchiano Attorneys for Plaintiff Kittrich Corporation Dated: October 25, 2012 ELLA CHEONG By:____________/S/ Sam Yip________________ SAM YIP Attorneys for Defendant Global Glory Industrial Limited
I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been
obtained from its signatories.
By:____________/s/ Karen C. Marchiano ___
KAREN C. MARCHIANO
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that the 3 expert deadlines from this Court's previous Order [Docket No. 32] are continued so that the 4 following deadlines apply:
January 18, 2013: Deadline for each party to comply with Federal Rule of Civil 6 Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) and (C)'s initial expert witness disclosure requirements 7 February 18, 2013: Deadline for any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure 8 authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(D)(ii)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.