IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 26, 2012
JEFFREY KEVIN GOMEZ,
EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, JR., ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO WITHDRAW OPPOSITION AND FILE AMENDED OPPOSITION (Doc. 98.) THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
Jeffrey Kevin Gomez ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner proceeding pro se
with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This
action now proceeds with Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint filed on
August 14, 2009, against defendant D. Ortiz ("Defendant") for
retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. *fn1
(Doc. 46.) On August 20, 2012, Defendant filed a motion
for summary judgment, which is now pending. (Doc. 89.) On October 15,
2012, Plaintiff filed an opposition. (Doc. 96.) On October 22, 2012,
Defendant filed a reply. (Doc. 100.)
On October 18, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental opposition to the motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 98.) Plaintiff cites difficulties in gaining access to the law library and obtaining legal materials and copywork.
The Court finds good cause to allow Plaintiff to withdraw his prior opposition and file an Amended Opposition. The Court will not consider multiple oppositions, however, and Plaintiff has two options upon receipt of this order. Plaintiff may either (1) stand on his previously-filed opposition filed on October 15, 2012, or (2) withdraw it and file an Amended Opposition. The Amended Opposition, if any, must be complete in itself and must not refer back to any of the opposition documents Plaintiff filed on October 15, 2012. L.R. 220. *fn2
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion to allow further briefing by Plaintiff in opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff may, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, withdraw his opposition and file an Amended Opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment of August 20, 2012;
3. If Plaintiff does not file an Amended Opposition in response to this order, his existing opposition, filed on October 15, 2012, will be considered in resolving Defendant's motion for summary judgment; and
4. If Plaintiff elects to file an Amended Opposition, Defendants may file a reply pursuant to Local Rule 230(l).
IT IS SO ORDERED.