Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tony Cobos v. E. Greenman

October 29, 2012

TONY COBOS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
E. GREENMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AUTHENTICATION OF EXHIBITS (Doc. 42.)

I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Tony Cobos ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on September 25, 2008. (Doc. 1.) This action now proceeds on the First Amended Complaint filed on November 6, 2009, against defendants Dr. E. Greenman and Dr. S. Suryadevara, for inadequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment.*fn1 (Doc. 9.)

On December 14, 2011 and March 21, 2012, Plaintiff filed motions for summary judgment (Docs. 24, 25, 29). On April 9, 2012, Defendants filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 30). On October 3, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for authentication of exhibits. (Doc. 42.)

II. AUTHENTICATION OF EVIDENCE

"To satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence, the proponent must produce "evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims it is." Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). A proper foundation can be established through an affidavit made on personal knowledge that meets the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). See Orr v. Bank of America, NT & SA, 285 F.3d 764, 774 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Alternatively, documentary evidence can be authenticated under Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(1) by a witness who wrote it, signed it, or saw others do so; or as a self-authenticating document under Federal Rule of Evidence 902. See id. at 774; Fed. R. Evid. 901(b); Fed. R. Evid. 902.

II. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

Plaintiff requests the Court to make a finding that his exhibits, which he describes as follows, are authenticated pursuant to Rules 901 and 902 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

(1) Exhibit A - CDC 7362 Health Care Services Request Form, dated May 10, 2012;

(2) Exhibit B - Encounter Form, dated May 11, 2012;

(3) Exhibit C - Record of Chronic Care Follow Up Visit, dated May 15, 2012;

(4) Exhibit D - CDC 7243 Health Care Request for Services, dated April 11, 2012;

(5) Exhibit E - Outpatient Surgery Patient Instruction, dated June 6, 2012.

Plaintiff has submitted copies of the exhibits for the Court's review, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.