Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Angel Arturo Vargas

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 29, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANGEL ARTURO VARGAS, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar #214897 Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 498-5700 Attorney for Defendant ANGEL ARTURO VARGAS

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER EXCLUDING TIME DATE: December 6, 2012 TIME: 9:00 a.m. JUDGE: Morrison C. England, Jr.

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status conference on October 25, 2012.

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until December 6, 2012 and to exclude time between October 22, 2012 and December 6, 2012 under Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a. Discovery has been produced directly to counsel and/or made available for inspection and copying.

b. Counsel for defendant desires additional time to consult with his client, to review the current charges, to conduct investigation and research related to the charges, and to discuss potential resolutions with his client.

c. Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny him the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

d. The government does not object to the continuance.

e. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.

f. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act,

18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of October 22, 2012 to December 6, 2012, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. The status conference previously set for October 25, 2012 is rescheduled for December 6, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.

20121029

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.