Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Metropolitan v. Natisha Robinson-Lee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 30, 2012

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
NATISHA ROBINSON-LEE, T.L., A MINOR, AND R.L., A MINOR,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Edward M. Chen Judge United States District

UPDATED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT ORDER RESETTING FURTHER CMC DATE: November 2, 2012 TIME: 10:30 a.m. CRTM: 5, 17th Floor Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife") provides the following updated case 21 management conference statement, with regard to the currently scheduled further case 22 management conference. As the parties informed the Court they would do (at the case 23 management conference held on July 31, 2012 and in their supplemental case management 24 conference statement filed on August 29, 2012 (ECF No. 15)), the parties have been engaged 25 in discussions regarding possible ways to resolve the issues so that the life insurance benefits 26 can be paid out. 27

An agreement has been reached between MetLife and Ms. Robinson-Lee, but the 28 parties require additional time in which to finalize matters. Communications with Ms. Robinson-Lee have been slow and difficult, due to lack of electronic communication 2 capability. MetLife also has been in contact, however, with an attorney who reportedly is 3 preparing guardianship papers so that Ms. Robinson-Lee's children (the two minor defendants 4 in the litigation) can receive the life insurance benefits. 5

MetLife believes that the matter will be concluded, from standpoint of the litigation,

6 within the next 30 days. MetLife therefore requests that the Court continue the pending case 7 management conference for an additional 30 days, to permit the ancillary procedures, such as 8 establishment of a guardianship for the minor defendants, to be completed, thereby allowing 9 the litigation to be dismissed. 10 11

DATED: October 26, 2012 SEDGWICK LLP By:__/s/ Erin A. Cornell_______________ Rebecca A. Hull Erin A. Cornell Attorneys for Plaintiff Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

IT IS SO ORDERED that the Further CMC is reset from 11/2/12 to Thursday 1/17/13 17 at 10:30 a.m. An updated joint CMC Statement shall be filed by 1/10/13.

ES DISTR

IT IS SO ORDERED

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action. My business address is Sedgwick LLP, 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor, San 3

Francisco, California 94104. On October 26, 2012, I served the within document(s): 4

UPDATED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

 FACSIMILE - by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth on the attached Telecommunications Cover Page(s) on this date before 5:00 p.m.

 ELECTRONIC MAIL - by emailing the document to defendant at email address as set forth below.

 PERSONAL SERVICE - by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below.

 OVERNIGHT COURIER - by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed 10 envelope with shipping prepaid, and depositing in a collection box for next day delivery to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below via .

Natisha N. Robinson-Lee 222 Ward Street San Francisco, CA 94134 Electronic mail: trzurdlee1@yahoo.com Defendant

I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence 15 for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on 16 motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 17

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above 18 is true and correct. Executed on October 26, 2012, at San Francisco, California.

Sharice Valenzuela

Sharice Valenzuela

PROOF OF SERVICE

20121030

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.