UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 30, 2012
WEBER NAMEPLATE, ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Present: The Honorable Ronald S.W. Lew, U.S. District Court Judge
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Joseph Remigio Not Present n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present Not Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
This Order is issued pursuant to FRCP 4(m), which requires that Plaintiff serve the summons and complaint upon all Defendants within 120 days after filing the complaint. The Court may dismiss the if Plaintiff has not diligently prosecuted the action.
It is the responsibility of Plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the Action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1.
The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted. As this Court in its Order to Set Aside Default Judgment  against Defendant Daryl Speach ("Defendant"), August 15, 2012, there is strong and convincing evidence that Defendant was not validly served in Action. Furthermore, Plaintiff has taken no action in this case since the Court's Order of August 15,
Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later NOVEMBER 6, 2012, why this Action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response plaintiff(s) is due.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.