UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 30, 2012
SAMUEL BRANDON KRESS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2012, Defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("Defendant" 3 or "PwC") filed a notice of motion for an order determining Plaintiffs' responses to PwC's 4 written discovery requests to be insufficient and compelling sufficient responses to PwC's 5 discovery requests, which PwC noticed to be heard on November 1, 2012 (Docket: 307); 6
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2012, Plaintiffs filed an Ex Parte Application seeking to 7 compel PwC to produce the designated 30(b)(6) witness for additional days of deposition or to set 8 a briefing schedule for a motion to compel to be heard on the issue (Docket: 308); 9
WHEREAS, on October 12, 2012, the Court in response to Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application set a hearing date for Plaintiffs' motion to compel to be heard on November 1, 2012 11 (Docket 309); 12
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2012, Plaintiffs provided further responses to some of the 13 discovery requests that are the subject matter of PwC's above-referenced discovery motion; 14
WHEREAS, the parties intend to engage in further meet and confer efforts regarding Plaintiffs' responses to PwC's discovery requests, the result of which may impact the scope of 16 PwC's discovery motion; 17
WHEREAS, to accommodate these discussions as well as the unavailability of Plaintiffs' 18 counsel, the parties jointly seek to continue the November 1, 2012 hearing date for the parties' 19 respective discovery motions; 20
WHEREAS, the parties request that their motions be heard on the next available hearing 21 date, which the parties understand to be December 6, 2012; 22
NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate that the Court may enter an Order as follows:
1. The discovery motions presently set to be heard on November 1, 2012, shall 24 instead be heard on December 6, 2012. 25 26 27 28
Dated: October 25, 2012 PETER MUHIC Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP
EDWARD WYNNE Wynne Law Firm WILLIAM BAIRD Markun Zusman & Compton LLP
STEVEN ELSTER Law Office of Stephen Elster By: /s/William Baird
WILLIAM BAIRD Attorneys for Plaintiffs SAMUEL BRANDON KRESS, et al.
October 25, 2012
DANIEL J. THOMASCH LAUREN J. ELLIOT MICHELE L. MARYOTT JULIAN W. POON
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP NORMAN C. HILE JULIE A. TOTTEN DAVID A.
PRAHL Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP By: /s/Daniel J. Thomasch
DANIEL J. THOMASCH Attorneys for Defendant PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Gregory G. Hollows
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.