UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 31, 2012
YVETTE FELARCA, ET AL.
ROBERT J. BIRGENEAU, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers United States District Court Judge
RONALD CRUZ, California Bar No. 267038 SHANTA DRIVER, Michigan Bar No. P65007* SCHEFF, WASHINGTON & DRIVER, P.C. 1985 Linden Street Oakland, CA 94607 (510) 384-8859 Fax: 313-963-7587 email@example.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs *Admitted pro hac vice
STIPULATION AND MODIFIED 10 ORDER TO REVISE CASE SCHEDULE 11
Date: November 20, 2012 12 Time: 2:00 p.m. Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
14 The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 15 I.RECITALS 16 1. On October 17, 2012, this Court ordered the following schedule for this case, per the 17 parties' stipulation, which was entered at the request of the plaintiffs: 18 i. Oppositions to motions filed in response to the Amended Complaint were 19 due on October 23, 2012. 20 ii. Replies to oppositions to motions filed in response to the Amended 21 Complaint are due on November 6, 2012. 22 iii. Hearings on any motions filed in response to the Amended Complaint 23 shall take place on Tuesday, November 20, 2012, at 2 p.m. 24 iv. The Case Management Conference is set for December 3, 2012.
2. This was the second postponement of the current proceedings. The hearing on motions 2 filed in response to the Amended Complaint had previously been scheduled for 3 November 13, 2012, and the Case Management Conference (CMC) had previously been 4 scheduled for September 10, 2012. 5 3. Counsel for plaintiffs have requested that defendants stipulate to a rescheduling of the 6 November 20 hearings and the December 3 Initial Case Management Conference. 7 Plaintiffs' lead counsel, Shanta Driver, has been invited to speak at an international 8 conference in London November 21, 2012, the day after the current hearing date for 9 motions responding to the Amended Complaint. She also will prepare for and appear at 10 an immigration hearing in London that week. 11 4. The motions to dismiss, if granted, would narrow the issues of this case before the Case 12 Management Conference. 13 5. Counsel for the parties have agreed to stipulate to the following briefing schedule, subject 14 to the Court's approval: any replies to oppositions to motions would be due November 15 13, 2012. (Previously, the Court granted an extension that provided plaintiffs an 16 additional week to prepare their oppositions; this date change would similarly give 17 defendants an additional week to prepare their replies.) 18 6. The attorneys have consulted and determined that we are all jointly available on 19 December 4, 2012 for the hearing on motions to dismiss. 20 7. The attorneys have consulted and determined that we are all jointly available on 21 December 17, 2012, or a later Monday, for the Initial Case Management Conference. 22 23
1. Any replies to oppositions to motions filed in response to the Amended Complaint shall 2 be due on November 13, 2012. 3 2. Hearings on any motions filed in response to the Amended Complaint shall take place on 4 Tuesday, December 4, 2012 at 2 p.m., or at such other time as the Court may order. 5 3. The Initial Case Management Conference shall take place on Monday, December 17, 6 2012 at 2 p.m., or at such other time as the Court may order. 7 By the parties' attorneys IT IS SO STIPULATED, 8
5 The Hearing on the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss is CONTINUED from November 20, 6 2012 to December 11, 2012. 7 The Case Management Conference is CONTINUED from December 3, 2012 to February 8 11, 2013. 9
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,AS MODIFIED,IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.