UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 1, 2012
RAYMOND SHERMAN, SR., PETITIONER,
LARRY E. SCRIBNER, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Stephen V. Wilson United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the "Petition"), petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Supplement to First Amended Petition ("Motion to Supplement") and the documents submitted in connection therewith, the Magistrate Judge's Order Denying the Motion to Supplement ("Order Denying Supplement"), petitioner's Objections to the Order Denying Supplement ("Supplement Objections"), the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation") and petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation ("R&R Objections"). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made.
The Court approves and adopts the Order Denying Supplement and the Report and Recommendation and overrules petitioner's Supplement Objections and R&R Objections which essentially reargue the merits of petitioner's claims and are without merit.
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.