UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 1, 2012
SIA MURPHY, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Stephen V. Wilson United States District Judge
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Murphy, Bradley, and Bacon (the "Murphy Motion"), the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Easton, Castaneda, and Younce (the "Easton Motion"), all of the records herein, the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed on September 23, 2011 ("Report"), plaintiff's Objections to the Report filed on December 20, 2011, and plaintiff's July 5, 2011 Objections to the Magistrate Judge's prior Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated in writing. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.
IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Murphy Motion is granted pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (2) the Easton Motion is granted pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and (3) Judgment shall enter dismissing this action with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.