Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Robin Antonick, An Illinois Citizen v. Electronic Arts Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 6, 2012

ROBIN ANTONICK, AN ILLINOIS CITIZEN,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Charles R. Breyer

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Date Comp. Filed: March 30, 2011 Trial Date: April 1, 2013

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to an extended briefing schedule for Defendant's Motion 2 for Summary Judgment which was entered by the Court on October 25, 2012; 3

WHEREAS, pursuant to the stipulation Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion for 4 summary judgment is due November 2, 2012, and EA's reply in support of its motion for summary 5 judgment is due November 12, 2012, with the hearing on the motion to be held December 14, 6 2012; 7

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to the current schedule due to the deposition of William Kaiser being continued to October 31, 2012, because of a death in his family; 9

WHEREAS, William Kaiser's deposition must be continued a second time because 8 Hurricane Sandy prevented Mr. Kaiser from attending his deposition and Mr. Kaiser is still without 11 electricity; 12

WHEREAS, the parties nonetheless stipulate that Mr. Kaiser's deposition will take place on 10 November 19, 2012, and that Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment is 14 due on November 21, 2012 and Defendant's reply in support of its motion for summary judgment 15 is due on December 5, 2012. The motion will still be heard on December 14, 2012; 16

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff 17 and Defendant, that Plaintiff's opposition to the motion for summary judgment is now due on 18 November 21, 2012 and Defendant's reply is now due on December 5, 2012. 19

The authority for and concurrence in the filing of this stipulated request has been obtained 20 from each of the signatories, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3). 21

DATED: November 2, 2012 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 22 23 By /s/ Leonard W. Aragon LEONARD W. ARAGON 13 24 Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Antonick 25 DATED: November 2, 2012 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 26 By /s/ Susan Harriman SUSAN HARRIMAN Attorneys for Defendant Electronic Arts

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DI R

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

N IS SO ORDERED

Charles R. Breyer Judge O

20121106

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.