Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Alfred Brown v. David Kyle

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 6, 2012

ALFRED BROWN,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
DAVID KYLE, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DESIGNATION AND TRANSMISSION OF EXCERPTS OF THE RECORD (Doc. 145)

On October 4, 2012, following a two-day trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendants Kyle and Domingo on Plaintiff's claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and judgment was entered in accordance on October 5, 2012. On November 1, 2012, Plaintiff Alfred Brown, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a notice of appeal and what the Court construes to be a motion to designate and transmit certain excerpts of the record in support of the appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 10(a); Circuit Rule 30-1.2.

Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit Rule 30-1.2, pro se litigants are not required to file excerpts of the record, and Plaintiff's motion is DENIED on that ground. To the extent Plaintiff intended to seek additional and/or different relief not clear from the face of his motion, the denial is without prejudice to renewal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20121106

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.