UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
November 7, 2012
LEAPFROG ENTERPRISES, INC., PLAINTIFF,
RAPID DISPLAYS, INC., DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Complaint Filed: August 14, 2012
Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 16-2(d), Plaintiff LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc. 20 ("LeapFrog") and Defendant Rapid Displays, Inc. ("Rapid") request that the Court continue the 21 Initial Case Management Conference ("CMC") currently scheduled for December 13, 2012 in 22 Courtroom F, 15th Floor at 1:30 p.m., to January 10, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. Counsel for LeapFrog is 23 unavailable on December 13, 2012 because counsel will be representing LeapFrog at an arbitration 24 in another matter. The arbitration is scheduled for December 12-14, 2012 in Orange, California. 25 LeapFrog has met and conferred with Rapid regarding counsel's unavailability on that date, 26 and the parties have agreed to continue the hearing to January 10, 2013. The parties stipulate that 27 the remainder of the deadlines set forth in the Court's Order Setting Initial Case Management 28 Conference and ADR Deadlines remain the same.
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC & [PROPOSED] ORDER
DATED: November 7, 2012 Respectfully submitted, 2 /s/ Randall D. Haimovici RANDALL D. HAIMOVICI RACHAEL M. SMITH SHOOK, HARDY & BACON, L.L.P. 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. DATED: November 7, 2012 Respectfully submitted, 8 /s/ Oscar L. Alcantara OSCAR L. ALCANTARA STEPHANIE J. HARRIS GOLDBERG KOHN LTD ANDREW LEIBNITZ FARELLA BRAUN MARTEL LLP Attorneys for Defendant Rapid Displays, Inc.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
JUDGE JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.